> Yes.. I have had no luck with building pine either.
> The compiler options don't seem to do much as well. Oh
> well.. all of this is the result of buggy compilers
> and apps. Only if everything was as portable as
> advertised.
Okay, I'll try building it with gcc 2.95.2 and seeing if that fixes
anything. I doubt it will, but it's worth a shot. After that, I'll try
out mailing lists and then mail the Pine developers with my results.
We can't so much back down to a previous version of Pine and hope that
works, because the latest version fixed a security hole. I don't want to
keep a broken Pine around, but it's better than leaving an insecure one
around. Hopefully, all this will get resolved by the time the
distribution is ready for the public.
--
Chris Lumens - chris@slackware.com - KG6CIH
@n=(-42,-85,-83,-19,65,2,-10,-10,-15,-3,2,-10,73,-4,8,-4,2,79,8,17,15,7,14,2);
print map{chr(-$n[$i++]+ord)} sort(split(//,'place random string here')),"\n";
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri May 09 2003 - 10:00:02 PDT